The Four Topics Method of Analysis: A Pregnant Accident Victim Essay

The Four Topics Method of Analysis is a machine developed by clinical ethicists used to examine clinical encounters. This manner provides a consistent, organized framework for gathering information regarding the encounter in order to perform analysis. The method is organized into four parts checkup Indications, Patient Preferences, Quality of Life, and Contextual Features. We butt joint organize information regarding this causal agency study by using the Four Topics Method beginning with the health check Indications. Maria, a 20-year-old female, has been involved in a motor vehicle accident. She has a history of Sickle Cell disease and is currently twenty-five weeks big(predicate) with her first child. Initially Maria presents with somewhat stable vital signs. She debunks tachypnea, and complains of puckish abdominal cramping as well as weakness, light-headedness and left shoulder pain. She is neurologically inviolate with lung sounds that are within defined parame ters. Marias condition changes and she begins to display signs and symptoms of internal bleeding. This is a demeanor threatening condition. The problem is critical and can be reversed with a transfusion and surgery. The tendency of transfusion would be to replace blood loss and restore vascular volume and the goal of surgery would be to repair the bleed. If the bleed is corrected in a timely manner and without complication, the probabilities of success are somewhat high. There is no plan in place to account for therapeutic failure. Medical parcel out in this instance could not only save the life of this unhurried but also that of her unborn child. Further rail at to Maria and her fumble could be avoided if she would agree to the treatment. The next area to consider is Patient Preferences. In th... ...s driven by non-maleficence, or the intent to do no harm. They know that withholding treatment for apparitional beliefs will potentially be fatal to both. While Mari a is acting out of loyalty to her religious beliefs, the medical staff is acting out of loyalty to the patients well being and that of her unborn child. It would be unfair if no fellowship were acting on behalf of that child. In conclusion, providers in this case must watch every option in delivering life saving treatment for this child. This whitethorn involve legal action. If it were just Maria providers may attempt to beguile her decision, but ultimately it would be up to her to refuse suggested treatment. Since her decision affects the life of the baby providers are called upon to save that child . Works CitedUnborn Victims of fury Act, 10 and 18 U.S.C. 1841 et seq. (Cornell Law 2004).