Apophatical Metaphysics of a Subject :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Apophatical Metaphysics of a SubjectABSTRACT In this paper, the inevitability of the metaphysics of a fount for the philosophical empathizeing of a persons organism in the world is established, and the apophatic character of this type of metaphysics is discussed. Analysis of the categories of be and non-being which allow the interpretation of a repress as transcendent and as transcendental being that is characterized by uniformity, spontaneity and irreversibility is also mentioned. The suggested interpretation of a subject discloses both the rational sense of the classical minds of view on the absolute, unconditional, timeless and spaceless character of the subject of knowledge, and the compatibility of the nonions of the absolute character of a subject and the ontological condition of a human being in ordination and culture. The main idea of the suggested conception of a subject is the point that the subjects being cannot be housed into the world, nor can it be characterized as unattainable existence for the world. The world can be understood single from the point of view of being impossible (symbolic) existence. The discussion of the problem of identification of a subject shows that the presumption of a subject as one of the existent structures of the world leads to paradoxes and contradictions in the interpretation of the processes taking place in the world. To understand the process of education, it is necessary to bear in mind that it is not only cognitive, but also moral education is the process of the formation of a subject of knowledge through identification with transcendental symbolic existence, which fact demands making efforts to be on the part of the thinking person. I. Introduction few schools of modern philosophy buried the imprint of a subject in oblivion. Criticism of the classical reason that began in the second half of the 19 century has come to an end in postmodemism of the XX century with the solvent of the principles of plural ism, relativism, contextuality and decentration. These principles are incompatible with the classical view on a subject, an object, integrity and objectivity of cognition. The characteristic feature of the classical conceptions criticism of the 1-conceptions was the fact that it was aimed at opposing the consequences of the classical conceptions. These consequences include theories of the ideological forms of consciousness, theory of social progress, scientism, appreciation of truth as a function of power, violence, etc. We must not understand this criticism of consequences as sufficient ground to reject the notion of subject.