Response Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Response Question - Essay Examplea penning style which means that Sima Qian wrote as a sort out. Sima Qian observed the whole motion picture of the events in China, and wrote it from the standpoint of the groups view. On the other hand Herodotus wrote it mostly from his view point, adding up details which he thought were necessary for the readers to read. What did the group think of what happened? What did the group think was important to write down? Why did they think it was important? These be questions that we should answer. The most amazing thing about these authors is that they neer once met each other in person. Yet, for people who never met each other, never enjoyed each others company and never had a instill of coffee or tea over the dinner table together, their recollections and styles are vastly similar. The similarities become eminent to the readers by the different accounts of the writers that they give, and the brilliant ways in which they speak. Herodotus brillian t account of politics was fascinating to me, as was Qians ability to go off on random mythical journeys. Many would say this was separate, scarce it is also identical as both writers could go off onto one stretch of writing style and stay there. Regardless of the similarities that the two writers share their writing styles are vastly different. However the fact remains that Sima Qian and Herodotus are great writers and perhaps some of the best writers in history. Their writing style shall be continuously analyzed and young students and emerging writers will always try and strive for their great style. A major difference that the two authors know is the manner in which each writer presents his personal interpretation. As mentioned above Herodotus tends to go off on political tangents while Sima Qian tends to keep the political thoughts to a barely perceptible minimum. However Qian has no problem in exploring the mystical world of China, something Herodotus virtually leaves untouc hed. Qian wrote from what is known as the group standpoint. He wanted everyone to receive his entire message, to knock against his whole picture, so to speak. It is a contrast to be sure from Herodotus, who wrote from his standpoint and more about what he thought, and wasnt as worried about make sure that the entire group got the picture. However this does not means that readers of the text will not find Herodotus flow compelling. The first thing I find about both authors, as I was reading their work, was how stunningly easy the work was to read. Many history entertains are dry and full of only literal writing. However in my opinion this time the writing from the history book seemed to come to life. Although I liked Herodotus approach slightly better because I am more of a political person than a mystical person, yet Qians work was also equally engaging. However I did think that Herodotus work was more intellectually stimulating perhaps because it had a more historical and mor e fact-based approach. Many books, especially books about this time period in history, are quite boring although I was glad to see that this one was very interesting. I found Herodotus work to be more enlightening than Qians, perhaps because I was able to relate to the style of writing that he used and it was slightly better than Qians. Sometimes it was hard to know who actually wrote what document as the book did not always specifically mention it, thus making an absolute and fair analysis and comparison challenging, to say the least. I personally could not have done all the research and