Moscow Dynamo Football Essay Example for Free

capital of the Russian Federation Dynamo football EssayM any(prenominal) people would make out that sport helps bring people to traceher and helps overcome divisions of race, nationality, class and religion. The Soviets drew upon this ideal in 1984 when they called the Moscow games, the friendship games. As well as bringing people together, sport can just as easily heaving political consciousness and force people apart. The collective passion for Barcelona F.C is interlocked with politics, as is the conjunctive between sport and nationalism in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Supporting this view, George Orwell comments on the visit of the Moscow Dynamo Football aggroup to Britain in 1945, sport is an unfailing cause of ill-will andif such a visit has had any come upon on Anglo-Soviet relations, it could hardly be to make them slightly worse than before. (Atyeo, 1979, P.372)Governments father been known to use major sporting events to cause and divert the attentio n of the masses away from certain political and social problems that hoidenish might be encountering as well as trying to improve their national image. For example, in the guild months leading up to the Moscow prodigiouss, drunks, hooligans and dissidents were rounded up and headed out of Moscow to try to prevent any sort of dissent, which could mar their public relations.Certain groups use the prominence of sport, which has been increased in recent geezerhood thanks to sport becoming a global television spectacle, to make a political point. In most cases, the choice of sport to make the political point is arbitrary, as it is the prominence of the sport in the public eye which is the critical factor. The 1972 Munich Olympics saw the killing of 10 Israeli athletes by eight fortify Palestinian gunman, and the 1968 Mexico Olympics saw a protest by the student movement about the cost of hosting the games, which was a huge financial burden on the poor country, result in the army be ginning bite on the demonstration, killing 260 and injuring 1,000.Although politics does not only cite sport when dissidents intervene. There are a number of groups and individuals that have used sport and its prominent position in the public eye to raise political consciousness about what may be happening in that country. For example, the 2003 cricket world instill saw the wearing of a black armband by two of Zimbabwes players in protest against the Mugabe regime. The two players, atomic number 1 Olonga, the first black man to play for his country, and Andy Flower, in most cricket fans opinion, Zimbabwes greatest ever player, were to the highest degree universally praised for their dignified statement about the merciful rights abuses in their homeland. Ian Chappell, former captain of Australias cricket team and one of the many who applaud Flower and Olonga for their brave stance commented that you realise when you go through feel that there are occasions when you have a loud er voice. If theres something youre moved about, thats the time to speak out for those who do not have a louder voice.The World Cup also saw the boycott by England of their opening oppose in the competition against Zimbabwe, for which they first cited moral, political and security concerns, then changed it to concerns about player synthetic rubber as the reason for boycotting the game. A decision they might have latter regretted as the points gained for winning that match would have enlistn them into the super-six stage of the competition and maybe further. Theyre many people who believe that England made the right decision in boycotting this match, but there are also people who did not. David Coltart, who believes that politics has no come in sport, puts forward some arguments for going ahead with the match. He comments, paradoxically, holding the matches in Zimbabwe opens up a tiny piece of democratic space for those fighting tyranny. He also notes if no further matches take p lace (in Zimbabwe), there will be no further reason for the regime to behave better.Kate Hoey, write for Sky blusters online, who disagreed with Coltart, argues that the match shouldnt have been played because the message that will be sent out widely distributed is that Zimbabwe is a normal functioning country, which is patently untrue. She feels sport and politics must unite against the Mugabe regime and thence the England team needed to pull out of the match to raise worldwide awareness about the human rights abuses dictator Mugabe is undergoing. This view coincides with Ian Chappells view about the need to speak out for those without a louder voice.It is not only the players who sometimes feel the need to tackle political issues, the broad fact is that sports bodies on occasion have to confront inter-state political issues. (Allison, 1983, P.33) This was no more evident when the International Olympic Committee (IOC) excluded South Africa from the Olympic movement, not because of governmental pres authoritative, but because the social and economic system in South Africa does not pass on sport to be practiced there in accordance with the IOCs own rules as laid eat up in the Olympic Charter. The Welsh Hockey associations decision to not send a team to genus Argentina in 1985 because of the ill feeling that could still have been left over after the Falklands War is other example of a sporting body taking into account political situations before making a decision.There are so many examples of sport being influenced by politics over the years and so practically theoretical evidence linking the two to say sport can remain untasted by politics and politicians. Whether or not sport should remain uninfluenced by politics is of much wider debate. Events in Zimbabwe have highlighted many peoples opinions that sport and everyone involved in it has a responsibility to make sure important political issues such as the Mugabe regime are not ignored and that someth ing is done to try and resolve them. But whatever view you may have on whether it is right for sport to get involved with politics, it becomes apparent that sport and politics cannot be mutually isolated (Allison. 1983, P.29) however much the sports partisan would wish them to be.BibliographyBooksAllison,L. The Politics of Sport, (Manchester University Press, 1983)Whannel, G. Blowing the Whistle The Politics of Sport, (Pluto, 1986)Houlihan, B. The Government and Politics of Sport, ( Routledge, 1991)Lapchick, R, E. The Politics and Race of International Sport, (Greenwood Press, 1975)Voy, R. Drugs, Sport and Politics, (Leisure Press, 1991)Atyeo, D. Blood, Guts and Violence, (Paddington Press, 1979)