Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’ and Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ Essay

In doing this I will explore well-nigh of the chequer points in both(prenominal) novels. For font they both criticise the catch of time they atomic number 18 living in. For Golding it is after the Second valet de chambre War and he is lectureing that war could observe verboten again. Proving this is in the first chapter we read we was attacked This shows that mankind would attack children in a passenger plane. Whereas Conrad is living in the modern Victorian era where Europe has tweet imperialism on Africa and has utilize the natives into sla rattling. Evidence of this is the chain-gangs. first I am going to number at how both of the novels in some show a sort of journey into the pitying mind. In overlord of the travel it is where the children cross from the good side of the island to the drab side. This breaks with Jack formulation Bollocks to the rules This spikehwith showed the breakdown in society. This dented possibly non the journey of the children from good to bad, that it is a journey that the island takes from good to bad. It starts with Jack saying that his choir shall be hunters.This begins the journey. The island starts to get darker and the children start to show the apparition of the human heart. With hunters that gouge have qualities linked with it that turns plenty into untarnished animals with only one involvement on the mindkilling. This is showed by how when Jack, Simon and Ralph find the toleratedela buds, Jack acts aggressive with them Jack slash one of them open with his knife and its aromatise spilled over them. He didnt neertheless cut them open he slashed them. He again has killing on his mind with we cant obliterate them. It is non only Jack that has interpreted this journey into evil. Jacks tribe be heard to be chanting forever and a day Kill the beast Cut his throat Spill his bloodSo Goldings depiction of a journey into the human mind addresses the obsession of killing. Conrad has a mistakab le approach, provided instead of killing he subprograms madness. Evidence that this is a common thing in the Congo is when Marlow pays a manducate to the desexualise. The Doctor was then with a true eagerness asked me whether he could measure my item Marlow let him, and asked the Doctor whether he heedful the peoples heads when they come back too? nowadays the Doctor says something somewhat extraneous Oh, I never see themthe changes take get into inside you know So the Doctor implies that people go mad come in there and never come back.The characters in the cardinal novels sort of follow the similar lines. I have grouped the of import four characters from the two novels and have regularize them in to two pairs- Marlow and Ralph and Jack and Mr Kurtz. Firstly, with Marlow and Ralph they start off as good people notwithstanding they both make mistakes. For Ralph it was at long last letting the group vote on whether there were ghosts or not. He did not need to let the vote go. What was strange was the focal point in that he asked the inquiry Who thinks that there may be ghosts? That enquiry seems to lead everyone into saying that there argon ghosts. He without de model lost power. He should have asked, Who thinks that there argon no ghosts? This would have led everyone into voting for this. Marlow do the main mistake in cosmos led into Kurtzs charisma. He had declared his dislike of the off-white being kept, but when he met Kurtz you hear him say, I was mesmerizedJack and Kurtz were similar in that they were evil. I have already examined the way in that Jack is evil, as he instigated the break down in the society on the island. He also had a doughnut of bloodthirsty hunters. Kurtz is evil in the way that he brought in more ivory than all the other stations go down together but he never returned it.Looking at the viewpoint of the two novels I find that are in two different ways to address the nature of the novels. Heart of Darkness has M arlows viewpoint. I believe that this was done so that we could be in line with his thoughts and feelings. This makes us understand more about the night of the human heart. Whereas Lord of the wing has a bank clerk. We dont get the like inside intelligence as with Marlow, but we get some viewpoints such(prenominal) as Ralph wept for the end of innocenceHaving a narrator helps us to have foc employ on Ralph on a curve of learning. Simon is viewed otherwise as his mind is open to us. For example when he encounters the Lord of the Flies, the words that the Lord of the Flies are saying is notwithstanding Simon speaking to himself. Golding is constitution about Simon in this way so that he can express who the beast actually is. get a line thinking the Beast was something you could hunt you knew didnt you? Im part of you? We instantly now start to understand that something as bad as the Beast has been do up by the human heart.The condition that Conrad uses is firstly the Thames and then he compares it with Congo. He uses the fact that the Thames leads into the biggest, and the greatest, town on earth. because the journey down the Congo is a road to evil and darkness. The things Marlow see such as the chain gangs. Black shapes crouched, layattitudes of pain, abandonment, and despair They were dying very slowly-it was very clearIn Lord of the Flies Ralph is Adam in garden of promised land as he has an instinctual relationship with his surroundings, but his goodness gradually fades as he is tempted by evil. The apple in the Garden of Eden is the bad side of the island (the fort area). This is proved by the fact that that was where gross was killed his head opened and stuff came out and turned red. some(prenominal) novels address the darkness of the human heart. I believe that they are both very similar. Conrad and Golding both use death as their tool of evil. In Heart of Darkness it is the natives of Africa that are exploited and flogged until they die. In Lord of the Flies Golding has used the fact that even children would murder all(prenominal) other if they were in charge of society.Both of the texts are fables. The two authors criticise what is mishap or what could happen in their period of time. Conrad didnt like what was happening in Africa in the late nineteenth century. Golding was writing what could happen if another war broke out. They may both go to the extremes to designate society, but with the violence of the everyday populace and the overall greed, anything can happen.